A tiny device called an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter works to stop blood clots from travelling to the lungs. The device is implanted into our body's main vein during a quick operation (inferior vena cava). Blood channels called veins transport waste materials and oxygen-depleted blood back to the heart. A deep vein in the body experiences a deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). A clot is created when blood hardens and collects together. Leg swelling, discomfort, and soreness are symptoms of the dangerous medical illness DVT. Sometimes a deep clot in a leg vein can become dislodged and become lodged in a lung vessel. A pulmonary embolism, a vascular obstruction, may arise from this.
IVC filters may be implanted either permanently or temporarily. In 1967, the Mobin-Uddin filter made its debut. The high rate of thrombosis and occlusion, however, caused the Greenfield filter, which was initially reported in 1973, to soon displace other alternatives. Both the permanent Bird's Nest filter and the Greenfield stainless steel filter are incompatible with MRI. Other MRI-compatible permanent IVC filters include Simon Nitinol, TrapEase, and VenaTech.
Many victims filed IVC filter lawsuits as issues began to surface following the use of the filters. The following are some of the claims made in the lawsuit: filter migration, filter fracture, broken parts that remain inside the body, organ or vein puncture, issues with filter removal, and death.
On May 24, 2018, a verdict in Cook Celect's favour was made in a IVC filter lawsuit. A Texas jury determined that Cook had failed to appropriately warn the man's surgeon of the risks associated with the IVC filter, and as a result, awarded the firefighter $1.2 million. Jeff Pavlock claims that the 2015 filter that was implanted in him was tilted, puncturing his aorta and duodenum and necessitating further surgeries. The jury determined that while Cook's design was not defective, the company failed to fully alert Pavlock's surgeon of the dangers of the filter.
As the courts recovered from COVID in 2021, the IVC filter cases started to heat up. Three litigants each received verdicts in 2021. The most recent case was a $3.3 million judgement for a Wisconsin lady who had a Bard Meridian IVC filter. She had an IVC filter that had gotten stuck in a vein. To remove the filter and gather the fragments of the damaged filter, several procedures were necessary. A plaintiff received $386,250 in July from a jury in a shattered filter dispute against C.R. Bard. It is delivered following another jury's verdict holding the defendant accountable for these faulty filters.
As of May 2022, there were about 8255 active lawsuits filed against the manufacturer Cook. IVC filter claims have been lingering for a very long time, which has many plaintiffs angry and pleading with their attorneys to speed the cases along. These product liability claims, however, are not likely to produce outcomes right away. Plaintiffs should have patience since their cases will be resolved eventually. As we've seen, plaintiffs in IVC filter litigation have recently received some encouraging victories in 2021, which gives them some reason to be optimistic.
To manage your claim, get in touch with an attorney who has experience handling IVC filter lawsuits. Give the lawyer all of your medical records and other supporting documentation. He will decide whether you need to present an expert witness to substantiate your injuries. The IVC filter attorney will work with a professional medical record review organization to sort through your extensive medical data and choose the ones that support your claims. LezDo Techmed has been addressing a number of the mass tort lawsuits that have recently made news in the United States, including the like Truvada lawsuits, Elmiron lawsuits, IUD ParaGard lawsuits and opioid lawsuits. We can offer you rapid and cost-effective high-quality medical record reviews.